1 Introduction

Canid behavioral genetics is the study of the genetic foundation of behavior in members of the canid family. It has been of special interest due to the incredible genetic and behavioral diversity of canids, such as domestic dogs, wolves, and coyotes. Scientists have supported that canids are an excellent model for behavioral genetics since the fact that they possess varying social structures, ecological niches, and an abundance of available genetic data makes them ideal for that. Scientists have used different methods, including selective breeding, heritability estimates, and molecular genetics, to provide gene-behavior correlations and establish the genetic effects on behavior in such animals (Hall and Wynne, 2012).

Wolves, coyotes, and dogs form a robust comparative system to understand behavioral genetics due to their common ancestral origin and divergent evolutionary paths. Hybridization among them has introduced adaptive genetic diversity that has enabled them to adapt to diverse environments (Vonholdt et al., 2011; Monzón et al., 2014). For instance, coyote-wolf hybridization has formed hybrid swarms with unique genetic composition that enables them to occupy specific ecological niches (Monzón et al., 2014). Similarly, domestication of dogs from their ancestors, the wolves, has resulted in worldwide alterations in behavior and genes that have been appropriate to utilize as a model to study the impacts of domestication on behavior (Saetre et al., 2004). Knowledge of the gene foundation of the behavior of these canids will also provide understanding of how evolution, adaptation, and speciation work (Wayne, 1993).

This study provides an in-depth comparative review of the behavior genetics of coyote, wolf, and dog. It summarizes existing knowledge on the behavior genetics, evaluates the role of hybridization and gene flow on the behavioral traits of these species, and determines the molecular mechanisms and genetic markers for behavioral variation. The report includes a close analysis of genetic data from a body of research studies, synthesizing ecological and evolutionary implications of canid behavioral genetics and proposing recommendations for future research. It aims to improve the present knowledge base of genetic determinants of canid behavior and its broader application to species management and conservation.

2 Evolutionary Background of Canids

2.1 Divergence and phylogenetic relationships among wolves, coyotes, and dogs

The evolution of canids is marked by extensive divergence and hybridization events. The common ancestors of wolves (Canis lupus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) diverged into distinct evolutionary lines. High-throughput genotyping has also revealed that there are some hierarchical population units in gray wolves and coyotes that are consistent with geographic and ecological differentiation (Vonholdt et al., 2011). Hybridization has been seen between the two species, and coyotes and wolves create large hybrid swarms, particularly in regions like Ohio, where coyotes exhibit varying degrees of admixture with wolves and domestic dogs. Hybridization introduced adaptive alleles into the coyote gene pool, and it facilitated them in invading new geographic ranges and food niches (Monzón et al., 2014).

2.2 Domestication of dogs and its genetic implications on behavior

Domestication of dogs from wolves has put tremendous genetic and behavioral loads. Domestication notwithstanding, dogs and wolves are closely related genetically, great gene expression distinctions have resulted from domestication, particularly in the brain. Experiments prove that there is evidence of neuropeptide expression change of neuropeptides such as CALCB and NPY in the hypothalamus in dogs, which may be due to intense selection for specific behavior during domestication (Saetre et al., 2004). Moreover, structural variations like copy number variants (CNVs) were discovered in dogs and play a role in growth and neurological functions and depict domestication selection pressure (Ramírez et al., 2014). These genetic changes have been responsible for some of the differences in behavior between the domestic dog and its forebears, the wolves, e.g., being trainable with ease and accommodating being less afraid (Smith et al., 2017).

2.3 Adaptive traits specific to wolves and coyotes in the wild

Wolves and coyotes also have adaptive features that enable them to live in their habitats. For instance, hybridization with coyotes has resulted in wolf-like features in coyotes, particularly where deer densities are high, suggesting local adaptation due to natural selection (Monzón et al., 2014). The Himalayan and the Tibetan wolves have, in return, adapted to high-altitude environments through genetic introgression from an ancient, albeit neglected, wolf-like species. Introgression has provided adaptive advantages, such as the EPAS1 haplotype, associated with high-altitude adaptation (Wang et al., 2020). Such adaptations highlight the complex interplay between genetic diversity and environmental pressures in the shaping of evolutionary histories of wild canids.

3 Genetic Basis of Behavioral Traits

3.1 Identification of key behavioral genes in canids

A number of significant genes have been discovered by research that are accountable for canid behavior traits. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered major loci that are linked to herding, predation, temperament, and trainability in dogs. For instance, genes including THOC1, ASIC2, MSRB3, LLPH, RFX8, and CHL1 are accountable for herding behavior, while JAK2, MEIS1, and LRRTM4 are accountable for predation behavior (Shan et al., 2021). Furthermore, 11 loci were highly associated with a variety of behaviors, including howling frequency and sociability to humans (Morrill et al., 2022). The study releases the complex genetic foundation of canid behavior under both natural and artificial selection.

3.2 Commonalities and differences in genetic markers across species

Comparative genomic studies have been able to show similarities and differences in genetic markers in canid species. For example, the IGF1 gene size polymorphism region shows a single base substitution that differentiates small and large canids, the “small” one being more prevalent in small breeds while the "large" one in wolves and large dogs (Jordan, 2022). Furthermore, hybridization studies, such as the eastern coyote (hybrid coyote, wolf, and dog), have intermediate morphological traits and greater variation in hybrids, which express shared genetic markers among species (Zdjelar et al., 2021). Specialized adaptations, such as African wild dog, however, express species-specific genetic variation enforced by evolutionary pressures (Chavez et al., 2019).

3.3 Role of gene-environment interactions in shaping behavior

Gene-environment interactions form the core of the definition of canid behavior. From studies, it is clear that while there are some behavioral characteristics that are genetically determined, environmental pressures have significant influences on how they are expressed. Accepted as normal dog behavior in the modern breeds, for instance, is polygenic and environmentally determined with breed contributing marginally to the explanation of variation in behavior (Morrill et al., 2022). In addition, Tibetan and Himalayan wolves' adaptation to high-altitude environments as a result of ancient hybridization are the most clear demonstrations of how pressures from the environment can induce genetic adjustments influencing behavior and physiology (Wang et al., 2020). Such interactions highlight the interactive interface between genetics and environment in the evolution of canid behavior.

4 Behavioral Genetics of Wolves

4.1 Social structures and pack dynamics

Wolves (Canis lupus) possess complex pack life and social structure required for reproductive success and survival. Packs are formed as well-adjusted societies where all group members have a specific role to assist in defending the land, hunting, and rearing young ones. Living together is driven by competition for resources and increased survivorship rates (Cordoni and Palagi, 2019). Within the pack, there is a clear hierarchy, but dominants are often aided by subordinates in exchange for being accepted socially, and commodity exchange is thereby witnessed. In addition, there is post-conflict behavior through reconciliation following aggression and victim sympathy, requiring social sensitivity and coordination ability in delivering the appropriate reaction. These are all testament to the sophisticated social interaction and cognition wolf pack existence relies upon.

4.2 Aggression, territoriality, and hunting behaviors

Wolf aggression is influenced by both genetic and environmental conditions. Scientists have determined that interpack aggression is heritable with estimates of heritability ranging from 14% to 37% depending on the methods used. Aggression has several fitness-promoting advantages like better breeding and acquiring resources. Interpack aggression is strongly affected by relative pack size and reproductive status, illustrating how social processes and density-dependent processes generate variability in aggressive behaviors (Figure 1) (Schell, 2020). Wolves also are territorial, selecting habitats that maximize prey access and minimize human-caused mortality risk. For instance, packs with higher pup survival rates select hardwood forests and shun conifer forests, which correspond with the habitat selection of their main prey species (Oliveira et al., 2020).

4.3 Genetic contributions to survival strategies

Genetic introgression is a key aspect of the adaptive evolution of wolves. Introgressive hybridization among domestic dogs and wolves has been documented, with specific chromosomal areas favoring excess hybrid origin. FRD introgression in wolves is under genetic drift's major influence, and there are just a few positively selected genes associated with behavior and brain function. This introgression has been successful in realizing adaptive advantages in the form of increased genetic diversity and improved survival mechanisms (Pilot et al., 2021). Also, past hybridization has provided high-altitude adaptation to certain wolf populations such as the Tibetan wolves and Himalayan wolves through the introduction of beneficial genetic variants from a reclusive wolf-like lineage (Wang et al., 2020). These presents showcase the complexity of wolf evolution and their ability to adapt to a variety of environmental stresses.

5 Behavioral Genetics of Coyotes

5.1 Adaptability and ecological flexibility

Coyotes (Canis latrans) are ecologically flexible and highly adaptable and are able to sustain themselves in a broad variety of environments, including urban environments. This flexibility is, in part, made possible by cognitive flexibility that allows them to learn to cope with rapid and incremental change in their surroundings. Coyotes have been reported to track alterations in spatial reward contingencies and adjust their behavior based on such alterations, showing extreme cognitive flexibility (Van Bourg et al., 2022). This ability to adapt to novel and altering conditions is one of the reasons for their success in urban areas.

5.2 Genetic underpinnings of boldness and problem-solving

The coyote's boldness and problem-solving ability are genetically regulated. Urban coyotes tend to be more bolder and inquisitive than rural coyotes, a trait which has most likely been adapted due to the heterogenous selective pressures of the cities (Breck et al., 2019; Brooks et al., 2020). For instance, a study of a melanistic coyote in Atlanta revealed that although he was very bold in his action, he did not possess any hypersociability mutations, and thus boldness in coyotes can be influenced by other genes as well (Mowry et al., 2021). Additionally, possession of dog alleles in the genomes of some coyotes, acquired via hybridization, might also decide their exploratory and bold behavior.

5.3 Behavioral traits facilitating urban coexistence

Coyotes have developed certain behavioral traits that help them survive in human-dominated environments. Boldness and reduced wariness of human items are salient traits that help urban coyotes travel and take advantage of human-modified landscapes effectively (Brooks et al., 2020). These traits are a product of both learning and evolution as human-adapted coyotes that are likely to explore into novel situations are at an advantage regarding survival (Breck et al., 2019). Furthermore, cognitive flexibility enables the coyotes to accommodate the intricate and changing urban environment, thus better positioned to share their living space with humans (Van Bourg et al., 2022).

6 Behavioral Genetics of Dogs

6.1 Selective breeding and its influence on behavior

Selective breeding has played a crucial role in determining the behavioral traits of domestic dogs. Dogs were previously bred for function, such as hunting, herding, and guarding, and it led to establishing special behavior in the diverse breeds (Morrill et al., 2022; Dutrow et al., 2022). For instance, herding breeds possess behavior that is a domesticated form of predation, in which the urge to kill has been removed (Shan et al., 2021). Similarly, there has also been massive neuroanatomical variation across breeds, in line with specialized function (Hecht et al., 2019). But newer breeds that came into the market are being selected increasingly in terms of looks rather than useful behaviors, and that provides a connection between behavior and genetics (Figure 2) (Morrill et al., 2022).

6.2 Genetic markers associated with trainability, social bonding, and temperament

A few genetic markers have been found for large behavioral traits in dogs in studies. For example, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified several loci with trainability, social bonding, and temperament. Interestingly, genes MSRB3 and CHL1 were found to be associated with fear and herding behavior, and JAK2, MEIS1, and LRRTM4 with predation behaviors (Shan et al., 2021). Besides, SNPs in chromosome 26 have also been discovered to be associated with human-directed social behaviors such as physical contact and looking at owners in golden retrievers and Labrador retrievers (Persson et al., 2018). From the studies, some of the behavioral traits in dogs have been discovered to be strongly heritable and regulated by precise genetic variation (MacLean et al., 2019).

6.3 Comparison of behavioral traits between domesticated dogs and their wild counterparts

A comparison of the behavioral traits of the domestic dog to those of their ancestors, such as wolves and coyotes, reveals dramatic contrasts which have resulted from domestication and artificial selection. Domestic dogs possess a behavioral repertoire less fully developed or even lacking in free-living canids. Domestic dogs, for instance, are more social-attached and trainable, with this being less developed in wolves. Genetic studies have shown that some social behavior loci in wolves are unvariable but in dogs are variable, having been selected in the course of domestication (Persson et al., 2018). Second, while polygenic adaptations produce breed-specific activity in dogs, natural selection produces more homogeneous behavioral expressions in free-living canids (Dutrow et al., 2022; Morrill et al., 2022).

7 Comparative Analysis

7.1 Key genetic and behavioral similarities and differences among the three species

Wolves, coyotes, and dogs share both genetic and behavioral differences and similarities resulting from their ecological niches and their evolutionary histories. They share more recent ancestry genetically, and the dogs were domesticated around 10 000 to 40 000 years ago from the gray wolf (Pendleton et al., 2018). The close genetic relationship is seen in some of their behaviors, such as social organization and hunting behavior. Wolves are typically socially monogamous and possess extended parental care within packs, while domesticated dogs, specifically feral ones, possess more flexible social structure, including polygynandry (Natoli et al., 2021). Coyotes are typically solitary or possess smaller family units compared to the large wolf packs.

7.2 Influence of domestication on genetic and behavioral diversity

Domestication has greatly affected the genetic and phenotypic variation of dogs when compared to wild canids. Selective breeding highlights the enormous diversity of morphologic features and breed-specific behavior of domestic house dogs, which result from human demand (Plassais et al., 2019). This process has also resulted in deep genetic alterations, for instance, alterations in genes that are involved in the development of neural crest, which contribute to behavior as well as physical features like tameness, small jaws, and floppy ears (Pendleton et al., 2018). Domestication has also influenced the reproductive behavior of dogs to enable them to have more promiscuous mating systems compared to wolves' monogamous systems (Natoli et al., 2021). Genetic diversity in domestic dogs is also contributed to by introgressive hybridization with wild canids, which can introduce adaptive characteristics but at the same time reduce genetic diversity and promote tameness (Pilot et al., 2021).

7.3 Evolutionary trade-offs in wild and domesticated canids

Evolutionary trade-offs between free-ranging and domesticated canids are realized in their genetic and physiological adaptations. For instance, free-ranging canids like wolves and coyotes have adapted to ensure optimal survival in the environment. This includes the capacity to offer high levels of genetic diversity and adaptive traits for hunting and socialization (Figure 3) (Pilot et al., 2021; Zdjelar et al., 2021). By contrast, domestic dogs have been bred for traits beneficial in human-dominated environments, such as reduced aggression and increased sociability (Pendleton et al., 2018). This has also led to less lower genetic diversity and susceptibility to a variety of diseases (Wang et al., 2018). Also, domestic dogs have higher oxidative stress and lower antioxidant capacity compared to their wild canid counterparts, which may be the cause for their more limited lifespans (Jiménez and Downs, 2020).

8 Applications and Implications

8.1 Impacts on wildlife conservation strategies

Canid behavioral genetics, particularly the canid domestic and wild hybridization, has numerous uses in wildlife conservation. Hybridization may lead to the introgression of domestic genes into the wild population, and this will influence the genetic diversity and adaptability of the wild population. For instance, introgressive hybridization among Eurasian wolves and domestic dogs has been known to introduce genes that have been recorded to provide adaptive advantages to free-ranging domestic dogs but, in wolves, introgression mainly results due to genetic drift owing to small population sizes caused by processes such as habitat destruction and hunting (Pilot et al., 2021). This highlights the importance of maintaining high levels of wild canid populations in large numbers to regulate introgression rates and maintain the genetic integrity of such animals. The incursion of wolf-dog hybrids into Indian savannah also highlights the importance of instituting improved monitoring and citizen-science collaborative approaches toward curbing the canker of hybridization (Tyagi et al., 2023).

8.2 Insights into domestic animal breeding programs

Insight into the genetic foundation of morphology and behavior in canids can be of practical importance for breeding programs of domestic animals. The profound genetic diversity reported among domestic dog breeds, which has arisen due to selective pressure from humans, has produced the extensive variety of morphologic characteristics and breed-related behaviors. By charting areas under selection in the genome and variation influencing specific traits, breeders can make more informed decisions towards desirable traits and against unwanted traits. For example, GWAS have identified variants associated with body weight variation and explained a significant proportion of body size variation in dogs (Plassais et al., 2019). This kind of knowledge can be used to maximize breeding techniques, promoting domestic dogs' health and happiness.

8.3 Relevance to understanding human-animal interactions and coevolution

The study of canid behavioral genetics also describes the complex coevolutionary patterns and human-animal relationships. Canid domestication and their assignment to different tasks in human society, such as hunting, companionship, and wool gathering, demonstrate the extensive human-canid history (McKechnie et al., 2020). An Atlanta, Georgia, sighting of an unusually bold coyote with a domestic dog lineage exemplifies the impact of anthropogenic habitats on canid genetics and behavior (Mowry et al., 2021). Such sightings may potentially facilitate new behavioral traits and adaptations that can be utilized in human-canid coevolution. An understanding of these dynamics can inform efforts at establishing coexistence and reducing tensions between human and wildlife in increasingly urban environments.

9 Future Directions

9.1 Emerging technologies in behavioral genetics

The field of canid behavioral genetics stands to benefit enormously from emergent technologies such as CRISPR and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The CRISPR system offers the machinery for editing genes with precision, something that potentially could be used in investigating the functional effect of discrete genes on canid behavior. For instance, CRISPR is applied to edit genes involving social behavior in dogs and then observe the resulting changes and directly ascertain gene-behavior correlations (Plassais et al., 2019; Caragiulo et al., 2022). GWAS, on the other hand, allows one to ascertain gene variants associated with specific traits of behavior by screening the complete genomes of large populations. This method has been applied previously in the identification of morphology and behavior variants in the domestic dog and proved its applicability to wider use in canid behavioral genetics (Plassais et al., 2019).

9.2 Unanswered questions and areas for further research

Despite amazing strides, there are a number of problems that remain unsolved in canid behavioral genetics. One of the more salient areas to be investigated is the genetic determinants of interspecific variation in behavior, e.g., wolves vs. coyotes vs. domestic dogs. Finding out how specific genetic variations contribute to these variations may provide us with some clues about evolutionary pressures that have shaped canid behavior (Mikkel-Holger et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020). Also, the impact of hybridization is not known. Hybrid dogs, like coyote-dog hybrids, were discovered to possess unique behavioral patterns by means of studies (Heppenheimer et al., 2020; Caragiulo et al., 2022).

9.3 Potential for cross-species insights into behavioral genetics

Behavioral genetics cross-species comparison among different canid species offers a fascinating potential for generating cross-species inferences. For example, the comparison of genetic convergences and divergences between domestic dogs and high-altitude adapted wolves enables one to comprehend how particular genetic traits have been modeled through environmental pressure (Wang et al., 2020). Similarly, a comparison of domestication between dogs and wild canids can inform us about the selection pressures behind the expression of numerous behaviors in domestic dogs today (Zhao, 2018; McKechnie et al., 2020). Cross-species comparisons like these have the power to propel our understanding of the genetic basis of behavior and can be used to advise conservation and management of wild canid populations.

10 Conclusion

This comparative dog behavior genetics, coyotes, and wolves gives fundamental information about the genetic basis of behavior and evolution. Elaborate studies have uncovered some of the gene-behavior associations, notably through selection breeding in dogs, that have imposed limits on the ways domestication has affected behaviors. Gene expression changes in brain areas between wolves and dogs also mirror fundamental behavioral adaptations caused by domestication. Events of hybridization between coyotes and wolves or domestic dogs and coyotes have brought in adaptive genetic variants that influence behavior and ecological niches. Moreover, molecular genetic tooling has confirmed the complex evolutionary relationships and gene flow between canid species and thus conservation is complicated.

An understanding of canid behavioral genetics is a key to disentangling their history of evolution and adaptation as well as to broad biological and ecological research. High levels of gene flow and hybridization between canid populations emphasize the role of genetic variation for adaptation to environmental change. The findings are of relevance to conservation, particularly to the management of hybrid zones and conservation of the genetic integrity of endangered species. Additionally, canid behavioral genetics results generalize across taxa and uncover general processes of gene-environment interactions as well as the rapid adaptive response evoked by selective pressures.

Acknowledgments

We deeply grateful to the reviewers for their detailed feedback and guidance on this paper. Their keen insights into the issues and attention to detail have greatly benefited the author.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Breck S., Poessel S., Mahoney P., and Young J., 2019, The intrepid urban coyote: a comparison of bold and exploratory behavior in coyotes from urban and rural environments, Scientific Reports, 9: 21067.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38543-5

Brooks J., Kays R., and Hare B., 2020, Coyotes living near cities are bolder: implications for dog evolution and human-wildlife conflict, Behaviour, 157(11): 937-961.

https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-bja10002

Caragiulo A., Gaughran S., Duncan N., Nagy C., Weckel M., and Vonholdt B., 2022, Coyotes in New York City carry variable genomic dog ancestry and influence their interactions with humans, Genes, 13(9): 1661.

https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091661

Chavez D., Gronau I., Hains T., Kliver S., Koepfli K., and Wayne R., 2019, Comparative genomics provides new insights into the remarkable adaptations of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus), Scientific Reports, 9: 8329.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44772-5

Cordoni G., and Palagi E., 2019, Back to the future: a glance over wolf social behavior to understand dog-human relationship, Animals, 9(11): 991.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110991

Dutrow E., Serpell J., and Ostrander E., 2022, Canine lineages reveal genetic drivers of dog behavioral diversification, bioRxiv, preprint.

https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489536

Hall N., and Wynne C., 2012, The canid genome: behavioral geneticists' best friend?, Genes, 11: 789-801.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00851.x

Hecht E., Smaers J., Dunn W., Kent M., Preuss T., and Gutman D., 2019, Significant neuroanatomical variation among domestic dog breeds, The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(39): 7748-7758.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0303-19.2019

Heppenheimer E., Brzeski K., Hinton J., Chamberlain M., Robinson J., Wayne R., and Vonholdt B., 2020, A genome-wide perspective on the persistence of red wolf ancestry in southeastern canids, The Journal of Heredity, 111(3): 277-286.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esaa006

Jiménez A., and Downs C., 2020, Untangling lifespan and body mass discrepancies in canids: phylogenetic comparison of oxidative stress in blood from domestic dogs and wild canids, American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 319(4): 438-447.

https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00067.2020

Jordan B., 2022, Dogs, wolves and genes, Medecine Sciences: M/S, 38(4): 398-400.

https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022032

MacLean E., Snyder‐Mackler N., Vonholdt B., and Serpell J., 2019, Highly heritable and functionally relevant breed differences in dog behaviour, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286: 20190716.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0716

McKechnie I., Moss M., and Crockford S., 2020, Domestic dogs and wild canids on the Northwest Coast of North America: Animal husbandry in a region without agriculture?, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 60: 101209.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101209

Mikkelsen T.S., Sinding M.-H.S., Gopalakrishnan S., Ramos-Madrigal J., Castruita J.A.S., Silva P.M., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Marquard-Petersen U., Dietz R., Sonne C., Dalén L., Bachmann L., Wiig Ø., Hansen A.J., and Gilbert M.T.P., 2018, Population genomics of grey wolves and wolf-like canids in North America, PLoS Genetics, 14(11): e1007745.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007745

Monzón J., Kays R., and Dykhuizen D., 2014, Assessment of coyote-wolf-dog admixture using ancestry-informative diagnostic SNPs, Molecular Ecology, 23(1): 182-197.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12570

Morrill K., Hekman J., Li X., McClure J., Logan B., Goodman L., Gao M., Dong Y., Alonso M., Carmichael E., Snyder‐Mackler N., Alonso J., Noh H., Johnson J., Koltookian M., Lieu C., Megquier K., Swofford R., Turner-Maier J., White M., Weng Z., Colubri A., Genereux D., Lord K., and Karlsson E., 2022, Ancestry-inclusive dog genomics challenges popular breed stereotypes, Science, 376(6592): eabk0639.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0639

Mowry C., Wilson L., and Vonholdt B., 2021, Interface of human/wildlife interactions: An example of a bold coyote (Canis latrans) in Atlanta, GA, USA, Diversity, 13(8): 372.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d13080372

Natoli E., Bonanni R., Cafazzo S., Mills D., Pontier D., and Pilot M., 2021, Genetic inference of the mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs, Behavioral Ecology, 32(3): 646-656.

https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab011

Oliveira T., Benson J., Thompson C., and Patterson B., 2020, Resource selection at homesites by wolves and eastern coyotes in a Canis hybrid zone, Ecosphere, 11(6): e03320.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3320

Pendleton A., Shen F., Taravella A., Emery S., Veeramah K., Boyko A., and Kidd J., 2018, Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication, BMC Biology, 16: 64.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2

Persson M., Sundman A., Halldén L., Trottier A., and Jensen P., 2018, Sociality genes are associated with human-directed social behaviour in golden and Labrador retriever dogs, PeerJ, 6: e5889.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5889

Pilot M., Moura A., Okhlopkov I., Mamaev N., Manaseryan N., Hayrapetyan V., Kopaliani N., Tsingarska E., Alagaili A., Mohammed O., Ostrander E., and Bogdanowicz W., 2021, Human‐modified canids in human‐modified landscapes: the evolutionary consequences of hybridization for grey wolves and free‐ranging domestic dogs, Evolutionary Applications, 14(10): 2433-2456.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13257

Plassais J., Kim J., Davis B., Karyadi D., Hogan A., Harris A., Decker B., Parker H., and Ostrander E., 2019, Whole genome sequencing of canids reveals genomic regions under selection and variants influencing morphology, Nature Communications, 10: 1489.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09373-w

Ramírez O., Olalde I., Berglund J., Lorente-Galdos B., Hernandez-Rodriguez J., Quilez J., Webster M., Wayne R., Lalueza-Fox C., Vilà C., and Marquès-Bonet T., 2014, Analysis of structural diversity in wolf-like canids reveals post-domestication variants, BMC Genomics, 15: 465.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-465

Saetre P., Lindberg J., Leonard J., Olsson K., Pettersson U., Ellegren H., Bergström T., Vilà C., and Jazin E., 2004, From wild wolf to domestic dog: gene expression changes in the brain, Brain Research. Molecular Brain Research, 126(2): 198-206.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.05.003

Schell C., 2020, Investigating the genetic and environmental architecture of interpack aggression in North American grey wolves, Molecular Ecology, 29(9): 1757-1760.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15453

Shan S., Xu F., and Brenig B., 2021, Genome-wide association studies reveal neurological genes for dog herding, predation, temperament, and trainability traits, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8: 693290.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.693290

Smith B., Browne M., and Serpell J., 2017, Owner-reported behavioural characteristics of dingoes (Canis dingo) living as companion animals: a comparison to ‘modern’ and ‘ancient’ dog breeds, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 187: 77-84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.010

Tyagi A., Godbole M., Vanak A., and Ramakrishnan U., 2023, Citizen science facilitates first ever genetic detection of wolf‐dog hybridization in Indian savannahs, Ecology and Evolution, 13: e10100.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10100

Van Bourg J., Young J., Alkhalifah R., Brummer S., Johansson E., Morton J., Quintana V., and Wynne C., 2022, Cognitive flexibility and aging in coyotes (Canis latrans), Journal of Comparative Psychology, 136(4): 373-384.

https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000307

Vonholdt B., Pollinger J., Earl D., Knowles J., Boyko A., Parker H., Geffen E., Pilot M., Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B., Sidorovich V., Greco C., Randi E., Musiani M., Kays R., Bustamante C., Ostrander E., Novembre J., and Wayne R., 2011, A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids, Genome Research, 21(8): 1294-1305.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.116301.110

Wang G., Shao X., Bai B., Wang J., Wang X., Cao X., Liu Y., Wang X., Yin T., Zhang S., Lu Y., Wang Z., Wang L., Zhao W., Zhang B., Ruan J., and Zhang Y., 2018, Structural variation during dog domestication: insights from gray wolf and dhole genomes, National Science Review, 6: 110-122.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy076

Wang M., Wang S., Li Y., Jhala Y., Thakur M., Otecko N., Si J., Chen H., Shapiro B., Nielsen R., Zhang Y., and Wu D., 2020, Ancient hybridization with an unknown population facilitated high altitude adaptation of canids, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37(10): 2616-2628.

https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa113

Wayne R., 1993, Molecular evolution of the dog family, Trends in Genetics, 9(6): 218-224.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(93)90122-X

Zdjelar N., Nagendran L., Kendall C., Ackermann R., and Schroeder L., 2021, The hybrid skull of the eastern coyote (Canis latrans var.): nonmetric traits and craniomandibular shape, Journal of Morphology, 282(12): 1745-1764.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21417

Zhao F., 2018, Mining the hidden treasures from canid genomes, National Science Review, 6: 124.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy087